Supreme court judgement pdf. pdf of competent jurisdiction.

Supreme court judgement pdf In , 3 days ago · The Supreme Court has expressed strong dissatisfaction with the functioning of the Real Estate Regulatory Authority (RERA), calling its performance “disappointing. 730/2020 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 04-11-2020 in Crl. Bank Worksheet. , petitioner v. OREF & Default Judgement Template. Shah, S. 10,000 p. At Monday’s proceedings, Anyanwu urged the Supreme Court to void and set aside the judgments of the Federal High Court and the Court of Appeal in Enugu, which upheld his removal from office. Decisions, Supreme Court of the United States, Washington, D. Felton, 521 U. 73963/2023 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING OFFICIAL TRANSLATION] Date: 24-01-2025 In a 62-page judgment obtained on Thursday by DAILY POST, the Supreme Court made it clear that there was no iota or shred of evidence to support the claim that 27 members of the House of Assembly 1 day ago · Disappointed, Anyanwu petitioned the Supreme Court in February to overturn the rulings of the two subordinate courts and acknowledge him as the legitimate PDP National Secretary. JUSTICE ASIF SAEED KHAN KHOSA MR. on application to vacate the order issued by the united states district court for the district of columbia Delhi Race Club (1940) Ltd. WITH C. VS. Detroit Timber & Lumber Co. Dec 24, 2021 · On September 26th 2018, the Court delivered its judgment. 2014, affirmed the conviction and confirmed the death penalty imposed upon the accused by expressing the opinion that under the facts and circumstances of the case, imposition of death penalty awarded by the trial court deserved to be confirmed in respect of all the four convicts. 2509/2010 and M. 10169-10171 of 2008] PDF | धारा 197 सीआरपीसी | एक बार अस्वीकृत होने के बाद, सरकारी कर्मचारी की अभियोजन की अनुमति Mar 2, 2025 · Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. 1404 of 2023 Sukanya Shantha …Petitioner Versus Union of India & Ors. 8. 498A, 306 - Trial Court acquitted accused but High Court set aside acquittal and directed a de novo trial - Whether High Court right in directing examination of additional Feb 24, 2025 · Runit Rathore and Yashashvi Sharma*I. Preap (03/19/2019) before this Court. Dec 20, 2024 · The end of the year provides us at the Supreme Court Observer an opportunity to reflect on the Court’s activity over the past 12 months. (3) SCR 553), a three judge bench of this Court held that High Courts had no power, like the power available to the Supreme Court under Article 142 of the Constitution of India, and merely because the Supreme Court granted certain reliefs in exercise of its power under Article 142 of the Constitution of SUPREME COURT [Special Leave Petition (Civil) Nos. 6544078-Ayodhya-Judgment PDF download. These decisions, in our view, stand out for their significant political, economic and social impact. Criminal appeal No. Delivery of Documents to the Clerk’s Office. . 21720/2018 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 11-05-2018 in WP No. May 20, 2024 · Get Important 35 Landmark Supreme Court Judgements PDF Free Download by Siddharth Arora for UPSC CSE IAS prelims and mains examination. OREF & Summary Judgement Template Auction Sheet. 3506 of 2020 (Against the order of the High Court of Sindh, dated 11. 23–217 . Overview of February MonthThe Supreme Court (SC) of India pronounced multiple judgments this month relating to cases such as child custody, alimony or maintenance, bail, domestic v Read Now. The embedded filtering feature allows further filtering on available results, thus adding value to the search. CIVIL APPELLATE/ORIGINAL JURISDICTION . R. S. 2-son, is hereby affirmed by this Court; impugned common order dated 11. State of West Bengal and others (SUPREME COURT OF INDIA) Date of Judgment : 23/11/2004 Indian Penal Code, ss. e, M. Callahan, 555 U. 2015 passed by the Family Court, Nagpur, affirmed by the Bombay High Court, Nagpur Bench vide Order dated 14. 59 of 2018 writ petition (civil) no. CERT. 443, 458, it held that a state-court judgment 596us1r24_9p6b. Keyword . 7795 and 7799 of 2024. ) No(s). SUPREME COURT OF PAKISTAN (Appellate Jurisdiction) Bench-V: Mr. They do not form part of the Court’s decision or reasons and are not for use in legal proceedings. 2025 – Comprehensive Analysis in English & Hindi Comprehensive Analysis of the Supreme Court Order Dated February 20, 2025. The order dated 13th June, 2019 passed by learned trial Court was not challenged any further and thus the same attained finality. 1. …respondent with connected matters nagarathna, j. Union of India & Ors. & Ors. State of Uttar Pradesh & Anr. Sh. 749/95 (Supreme Court Monitoring Committee vs. But stare decisis is not an inexorable command, Pearson v. SUSKI . Justice Pankaj Mithal, Hon'ble Mr. The judgment of this Court cannot be read to mean that the powers of the Court to grant bail have been curtailed. 2014 of the Lahore High Court, Lahore passed in Crl. (CIVIL APPEAL /13950/2024) 10 FEBRUARY 2025 . 20543, pio@supremecourt. It recalculated the compensation, considering the claimant’s monthly income, future prospects, 40% permanent disability, medical expenses, attendant charges, special diet and transportation, pain and suffering, and loss DIG (Personnel) who held office as on 22 March 2023 guilty of contempt of court for willful disobedience of the directions contained in the judgment of the Division Bench dated 24 December 2019. in the supreme court of india civil original jurisdiction writ petition (civil) no. Case Subject Case No Case Title Author Judge Judgment Date Upload Date Citation SC Citation Download Aug 14, 2018 · (a) The Judgment and order dated 24. November 4, 2004. 21/2022 AND C. 12. P. Before the Allahabad High Court, voluminous evidence, both oral and documentary was led, resulting in three judgements running the course of 4304 pages. ET AL. And the Court’s Journal reflects all of the official actions that the Court takes - including orders, opinions, oral arguments, and admissions to the Court’s Bar. 2006 passed by the High Court of Judicature of Rajasthan at Jodhpur in Civil Second Appeal No. 730/2020 passed by the Supreme Court of India) RAJNESH Petitioner(s) VERSUS NEHA & ANR. S. 2022 On Higher Pension (With Illustration of Estimated Revised Pension and Differential Amount Payable)The story so far: Thousands of working individuals who are eligible for pension under the Employees’ Pension Scheme-1995 (EPS-1995) of the Employees’ Provident Fund Organization (EPFO) and those who already draw pension have The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. A. and Connected Matters. October 4, 2006. SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES . 16641 of 2023 6. 1366 of 2021, SLP (C) No. App. 73962/2023 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT & IA No. LRS. C. As per the said judgment dated 08. WARNER CHAPPELL MUSIC, INC. §1254(1) and §2101(e). This Court, in ITEM NO. March 29, 2010. M. Champakam Dorairajan 500+ items found for your search: supreme court judgment pdf download 2025 INST 329 Page: 1 of 72 1 day ago · The Federal High Court, Enugu, subsequently upheld Chief Sunday Udo Okoye as PDP National Secretary. ANASTASIA WULLSCHLEGER, ET AL. 321, 337. 2024 passed by the High Court of Delhi (hereinafter, ‘High Court’), dismissing the Appellant’s challenge to his arrest being illegal as well as his application for the grant of regular bail. Hardship Declaration The High Court declined to deal with the issues pertaining to the principles of natural justice and fair play considering the fact that they were pending before this Court in SLP (C) No. Special Master Reports. CJI D. TRUMP . gov, of any typographical or other formal errors. in the supreme court of the united states _____ no. 2) The appellants argued that reading The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. 28) The abovesaid judgment resulted in the 243rd Report of the Law Commission of India submitted on 30th August, 2012. CARROLL, ESQ. JUSTICE IJAZ UL AHSAN MR. , IS INVITED TO AMICUS CURIAE, IN SUPPORT OF THE JUDGMENT BELOW. Jupiter Capital Pvt. The earlier decision of this Court in State of Bihar Vs. 08. 2018 for payment of interim maintenance @ Rs. § 2201(e) and Supreme Court Rule 11, to review the judgment of the United States District Court for the of the Court, filed Civil Appeals No. August 24, 2017. Vide the impugned judgment, the High Court maintained the in the supreme court of india civil/criminal appellate/original jurisdiction writ petition (c) no. Some of the other cases included in this book include: AK Gopalan Vs State of Madras (1950) State of Madras Vs Smt. 54 COURT NO. Chinnaiah v Andhra Pradesh: Judgment of the Supreme Court. It is also known as the 'Doctrine of Prospecve Overruling,' I. Some of the Court’s most important constitutional This Court responded by granting certiorari, vacating the Mississippi Supreme Court's judgment, and remanding "for further consideration in light QPReport to adjudicate claims based on federal law and that the tribal court’s judgment should be denied comity because the Bank was denied due process. (MD) No. Where to Find Briefs. 1-wife, and Rs. This Court has jurisdiction to review the OCCA’s judgment. SIDDIQ (D) THR. 2024 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Bombay in Writ Petition (L) No. )). challenging the validity of Section 4(5) of the Punjab Act. They are recorded in this judgment. 10. Commencing with eight judges, the sanctioned strength of the Court presently stands at 34. 03. Justice Surya Kant's dissenting opinion judgment is under appeal before the Shariat Appellate Bench of this Court (C. Chandrachud J's Majority Opinion. Leave granted. Rajeev Bansal …Respondent . Foreclosure & Sale Judgement. Oct 3, 2012 · Supreme Court of India Girish Ramchandra Deshpande vs Cen. How to answer a Foreclosure. NOS. November 8, 2024. ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH Mobile View. Special Master Dockets Supreme Court detailed judgement on Asia Bibi's appeal - Free download as PDF File (. Judgment: D. introduction: 2-9 2. The judgment dated 28. SHERMAN NEALY, ET AL. Civil Appeal No 8629 of 2024 . Of India. JUSTICE MAZHAR ALAM KHAN MIANKHEL CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. in the supreme court of the united states united states department of state, et al. As 2024 nears its close, we have compiled our list of the top 10 judgements for the year. By its judgment dated 22 December 2021, the High court dismissed the writ petitions. On 25 July 2024, the Constitution Bench in a 8:1 majority held that states’ had the power to collect tax on mineral lands and mineral rights as per Entries 49 and 50 respectively. SCs/STs and OBCs cannot be excluded from economic reservations, as this would violate the fundamental right to equality. SHURTLEFF . Affidavit of Service. Detailed judgment reasons were to follow the order. State of Andhra Pradesh 6. writ, direction, or order, as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case, in favor of the petitioners and against the respondents. (1989 Suppl. CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR 2 days ago · “I hereby write in furtherance of His Excellency’s promise stated in my letter dated 5th March, 2025 to notify you that His Excellency has received the Supreme Court Judgment, and has therefore directed me to invite you and your colleagues – the Honourable members of Rivers State House of Assembly, to a meeting to discuss:- Provision of a befitting space for the Assembly’s sittings; No. , applicants, v. Foreclosure Auction Surplus Monies Form. 11. 39-L of 2015 (Against the judgement dated 16. Subhash Chandra Agarwal, 2019 (16) SCALE 40 . aids vaccine advocacy coalition, et al. 97 of 1984 and the concurrent judgment dated 10. Nov 11, 2021 · The district court’s final judgment was entered on November 4, 2021. 2 of 2022) May 26, 2023 · Reservations cannot be based solely on economic criteria, given the Supreme Court’s judgment in Indra Sawhney v. This book includes a lot of additional judgments. Feb 3, 2025 · The Supreme Court emphasized that the goal is to ensure just and fair compensation, even if it exceeds the claimed amount. 15063­15064 of 2022 are against the judgment of the Delhi High Court delivered on 22 nd May 2019, whereas in appeals having their roots in SLP (C) No. IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PAKISTAN (Original Jurisdiction) PRESENT: MR. 2023. DIY Foreclosure Answer Program ; Foreclosure Flowchart. No. ' Supreme Selections: Top Supreme Court Judgments of February 2025 Published on 28-Feb-2025. Supreme Court Judgment in Safari Retreats [Arising out of the Impugned Final Judgment and Order dated 25-11- 2022 in CRL. 3931 of 2021. Case Distribution Schedule. Consequently, the Petition No. … Mar 4, 2025 · e-committee, supreme court of india जिला एवं सेशन न्यायालय, बून्दी District & Sessions Court, Bundi e-Courts Mission Mode Project The High Court, vide judgment dated 13. 5. The dispute in these appeals arises out of four regular suits which were instituted between 1950 and 1989. 2025 4 days ago · Content Owned by Supreme Court Of India , Developed and hosted by National Informatics Centre , Ministry of Electronics & Information Technology , Government of India SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES Supreme Court Calendar (October Term 2025) (PDF) names the court whose judgment is under review, The Supreme Court of India •The Supreme Court of India is the highest Constitutional court of the Country which can be accessed directly by a citizen under Article 32 of the Constitution for redress of fundamental rights. Supreme Court of India 215 1994 SCALE (2)37 ACT: HEADNOTE: JUDGMENT: The Judgments of the Court were delivered by S. Final Review of the Filing petition seeking review of two or more judgments from the same court, where the judgments involve QPReport F. Syllabus . August 23, 2017. (C) NOS. C This petition came to be . 2014 of the Lahore High Court passed in Crl. The Single Judge granted an opportunity to the appellants herein in the following terms : “41 This Court, however, grants an opportunity of six (6) Judgements and Orders, High Courts of India. 02. CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES GSSCORE has compiled all the landmark important Judgements passed by the Supreme Court of India in recent time. This Court was considering an appeal against the setting aside of election of the appellant under the Representation of the People Act, 1951 to the Maharashtra State Assembly on the ground of speeches made directions issued by this Court by its dated 23 July 2024. The independent and adequate state ground doctrine precludes the Court from considering a federal question if the state court’s decision rests on an independent and adequate state law ground. 15,000 p. 614/2010). The matter was heard on 4th June 2024. In Brown v. Enter keywords, acts or any free text and find specific judgments and orders The court decided that all laws placed under the Ninth Schedule prior to the Kesavananda judgement cannot be called into queson for violang Fundamental Rights, but laws enacted aer the judgement can be brought before a court of law. The petitioners moved the Supreme Court. C. 1738 of 2021, judgments of the Delhi High Court delivered following the case of Bhartiya Khadya Nigam Karamchari Sangh (supra 1 day ago · The apex court, on Monday, in Abuja, reserved the judgement after taking arguments from Anyanwu’s lawyer, Kingsley Njemanze, SAN, and Chief Paul Erokoro, SAN, who stood for Aniagu Emmanuel. D. 12. RAVINDRA BHAT, J. 04. It upheld the Aadhaar Act as constitutionally valid. Jan 1, 2025 · In 2024, the Supreme Court of India delivered a series of landmark judgments that reshaped key legal and constitutional landscapes. Nov 5, 2024 · Further, the High Court also held that Article 31C of the Constitution bars any challenges on the grounds of Articles 14 or 19, if the statute has been enacted in furtherance of Article 39(b). Brijmohan Ramdass Mehra & Ors. respondents w i t h writ petition (civil) no. O. download 1 5 days ago · Content Owned by Supreme Court Of India , Developed and hosted by National Informatics Centre , Ministry of Electronics & Information Technology , Government of India High Court: The above order passed by the Trial Court was challenged by the Appellants before the High Court by filing a petition under Section 482 Cr. OCCA’s applica- 5 days ago · é—"rÜ / ÷ü ½œ—Î% ³#šû å98uÝ,‘¡%„ƒÀ-)ƒþ¶°‘ ÞÞ\¹ vöÉ—® ùý m Ò - é a üô çRâ%‡Wþ¹|oâ÷LüBú ÔÓ‡D¢ß§K ·M % ¤!-? ûpysÁ{Ïq%„FG/õhîZ¡ MnÎf‹ aôTJÒu-é öšÑ!­6ÄìóhrØä;äÈû mu:xºA+ Ë m L§ó #¹žÎyhM. global health council, et al. A total of1,08,000 seats are available for the MBSS course. See United States v. V. No. VERSUS UNION OF INDIA & ORS. 2021, the High Court dismissed the revision petition and confirmed the order of the learned Additional Sessions Judge dated Decisions, Supreme Court of the United States, Washington, D. 101/2012, as per judgment and order dated 08. Article 203G of the Constitution provides, inter alia, that no court including this Court itself shall, save as provided in Article 203F (which provides for Aug 28, 2019 · Supreme Court - Daily Orders Surya Roshni Ltd vs Employees Provident Fund on 28 August, 2019 Bench: Arun Mishra, Navin Sinha IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA INHERENT JURISDICTION R. They urged the High Court to recognize their long and continuous service, the nature of their work, and the lack of any backdoor or illegal entry. 614/2010) Mst. Opposing the State’s appeal against the order of the High IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO. Combination of any of the search criteria can be used to filter results. Ltd. Enter keywords, acts or any free text and find specific judgments and orders the applicants ask us to stay the State Supreme Court’s judgment or at least to order the sequestration of ballots that may be affected by that interpretation. As of January 19, the Protecting Americans from Foreign Adversary Controlled Applications Act will make it unlaw-ful for companies in the United States to provide services to distribute, maintain, or update the social media platform TikTok, unless U. PDF. 15448/2022 passed by the Madurai Bench of the High Court of Judicature at Madras] [IA No. 2 Criminal Appeal@SLP(Crl. ORACLE AMERICA, INC. [See Amrit Lal Berry vs. 39-L OF 2015 (Against the judgment dated 16. 203, 235. … Each opinion sets out the Court’s judgment and its reasoning and may include the majority or principal opinion as well as any concurring or dissenting opinions. donald j. Collector of Central Excise, New Delhi and Others, (1975) 4 SCC 714] 15. 2 of 2022) Pakistan Tahreek-e-Insaf through its Chairman Imran Khan (in Const. The trial Court, proceeded to convict the accused appellant vide judgment dated 7th November, 2019. to the Respondent No. Respondent(s) (FOR ADMISSION and IA No. (C) No. , 200 U. 8631/2024 Jan 2, 2025 · Judgment Summaries are prepared to help promote a better understanding of the decisions of the Supreme Court of India. 2021 in Criminal Revision Petition No. The Official Law Report Fortnightly ISSN: 3048-4839 (Online) Home-+ Judgment Deliverd by Coram . Hon'ble Mr. 3 Judgements and Orders, High Courts of India. v. 20100 of 2023 and Others, whereby the High Court has dismissed the said Writ Petitions by holding that the Banks/ Non-Banking Financial Companies (NBFCs) are not obliged to adopt the restructuring process as Decisions, Supreme Court of the United States, Washington, D. It ruled that the Act empowers disenfranchised sections of society by providing them better access to fundamental entitlements, such as State subsidies. 2. Oct 3, 2024 · Supreme Court of India Sukanya Shantha vs Union Of India on 3 October, 2024 Author: Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud Bench: Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud 2024 INSC 753 Reportable IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION Writ Petition (C) No. E. › z2qÇw¸´ƒÌ—c}íN Tq¸ðÝ͇Åí³ˆº6¤å$9 c¬ I wxŠ Nov 9, 2019 · Judgment by the Supreme Court of India on the Ayodhya case [PDF 3. MAHANT SURESH DAS & ORS. RESPONDENT(S) J U D G M E N T S. This judgment does not take away the power of the Court to grant regular bail even if the period undergone by a prisoner is less than what is provided in the said judgment. 46342 of 2013, the appellants herein, who are third parties to the proceedings, have preferred the 1 Hereinafter shortly referred to as “the High Court” Digital Supreme Court Reports . Among the most significant were the AMU verdict; Mineral rights; Unilateral appointment of arbitrators; Constitutional validity of UP Board of Madarsa Education Act, 2004; State’s power to regulate industrial alcohol; Interpretation of Section 6A of the Challenging the final judgment and order dated 05. We are indeed surprised that the High Court overturned two concurrent decisions, and did so without quoting law, shariah or precedent to support the decision. SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES _____ No. PDF IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PAKISTAN (APPELLATE JURISDICTION) PRESENT: MR. 20-1199 students for fair admissions, inc. 1813/2018 passed by the High Court Of Delhi At New Delhi) Court, and the trial court also sent the Capital Sentence Reference (CSR) to the High Court for confirmation of the death sentence or otherwise. ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH Dec 18, 2022 · Explained Impact Of Supreme Court (SC) Judgement Dated 04. 1224 OF 2017 INITIATIVES FOR INCLUSION FOUNDATION APPELLANT(S) & ANR. CITY OF BOSTON . FAUSTINO SANCHEZ CARRERA, ET AL. The appeal and the CSR were heard together by the High Court. The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. As the case lay pending, in 2019, subsequent amendments to the MHADA precipitated a new set of challenges. 443, 458, it held that a state-court judgment 16-1363 Nielsen v. 86 MB] Source: Supreme Court of India On November 9, 2019, the Supreme Court of India also dismissed a Special Leave Petition by the Shia Central Board of Waqf, Uttar Pradesh, against a 1946 Judgment by the High Court, Faizabad, as there was "inordinate delay" in the filing of Feb 27, 2024 · On 14 March 2024, the Supreme Court reserved judgement after eight days of hearings. 3965-3966/2013 SURYA ROSHNI LTD PETITIONER(S) VERSUS EMPLOYEES PROVIDENT FUND & ORS. 5029/2022 1. Chandrachud's majority opinion. The summary of 100+ landmark Supreme Court judgments is given in table format for quick learning and revision. R Coelho and State of Tamil Nadu (2007) Surinder Kumar and others (1991 Suppl. etc. The Bombay High Court read down this definition to also include female relatives of the male respondent. 6622/2021 - APPROPRIATE ORDERS/DIRECTIONS) Date : 19-02-2021 These matters 5. , the Supreme Court (SC) cleared the air on whether reduction in a company's share capital constitutes a “transfer” under Section 2(47) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (IT Act). SALES, INC. The National Testing Agency 2 conducts the NEET every year for admission into medical colleges. 975 of 2022 a n d Nov 9, 2019 · Full Transcript Of Indian Supreme Court Final Verdict On Ayodhya. Being aggrieved thereby, the appellant had approached this Court by filing Special Leave Petition (Criminal) Nos. , OF WASHINGTON, D. REPUBLIC OF HUNGARY . We have heard a broad diversity of viewpoints from CPIO, Supreme Court of India v. By a judgment dated 29 March 2010, the High Court of Punjab and Haryana declared Section 4(5) unconstitutional, relying on the judgment of the Constitution Bench of this Court in EV Chinniah v. Capital reduction is the process by which a company reduces its 9. BanshiRam Modi and ors. M/S. The High Court also overlooked the judgement of this Court in the case of Razia Rehman, relevant portion whereof is reproduced hereunder was also overlooked: 8. This petition is filed un-der Supreme Court Rule 11. pdf of competent jurisdiction. Justice Syed Mansoor Ali Shah Mrs. A 1/2000 and connected cases (Tanveer Jehan v Federation of Pakistan and others, etc. Vs. 3d 1135 ORDER OF JULY 28, 2015: CATHERINE M. The Punjab Scheduled Castes and Backward Classes (Reservation in Services) Act, 2006. JUSTICE SYED MANSOOR ALI SHAH CONST. 2014 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad1 in Writ-C. GOOGLE LLC . 9 of 2022) …Petitioner(s) Versus Federation of Pakistan through M/o Interior Islamabad and others (in Const. The application of the State Supreme Court’s interpreta-tion in the upcoming election is a matter of considerable im-portance, but even if we agreed with the applicants’ federal JUDGEMENT SURYA KANT, J. CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. The present Appeal is filed assailing the correctness of these orders vis-à-vis the larger question of law, as framed by the High Court: “Whether the signatory of the cheque, 4 days ago · Content Owned by Supreme Court Of India , Developed and hosted by National Informatics Centre , Ministry of Electronics & Information Technology , Government of India The judgement was unprecedented for several reasons: the Supreme Court acknowledged and relied to a great extent on international treaties that had not been transformed into municipal law; the Supreme Court provided the first authoritative definition of ‘sexual harassment’ in India; and confronted with a statutory vacuum, it went creative Various other filter criteria include High Court, Act, Sections,Names of the parties, Hon'ble judge name, judgment date etc. OBERGEFELL . 3162-P/2019, wherein it was held that the High Court The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. pdf), Text File (. This document summarizes a Supreme Court of India case regarding the constitutional validity of Section 2(q) of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005. 95/2013 is under challenge in this appeal by special leave. Judgment: Chelameshwar J's Concurring Opinion. 11. COINBASE, INC. trump, president of the united states, et al. ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR The Supreme Court of India in review judgement of Punjab and Haryana High Court, delivered a landmark verdict allowing states the authority to sub-classify reserved category groups, such as Scheduled Castes (SCs) and Scheduled Tribes (STs), for the purpose of reservations. (s) 1. INTRODUCTION Recently, in the case of Principal Commissioner of Income Tax-4 & Anr. 2023 as well as the relied upon judgment and order dated 08. m. Aug 23, 2017 · Judgment. 5 Question Sheet. dismissed by the High Court by its order dated 04. ” 7. 23–677 _____ ROYAL CANIN U. But by 1953, this Court had begun to depart from that understanding. Enter keywords, acts or any free text and find specific judgments and orders Aug 11, 2020 · Supreme Court of India Vineeta Sharma vs Rakesh Sharma on 11 August, 2020 Equivalent citations: AIR 2020 SUPREME COURT 3717, AIRONLINE 2020 SC 676 Author: Arun Mishra Bench: M. Justice Ayesha A. Malik Civil Petition No. Allen, 344 U. The key issues are: 1) Section 2(q) defines "respondent" as an adult male person. E-Courts in India: Progress, Challenges, and Future Prospects The Supreme court on 28 February 2019 ruled that all allowances in question are to be treated as wages for the purpose of provident fund (PF), effectively widening the definition of pay for the purpose of PF. Asia Bibi 6 hours ago · The Supreme Court has reserved judgment in an appeal filed by Senator Samuel Anyanwu on the dispute between him and Sunday Ude-Okoye to determine the authentic National Secretary of the Peoples considered by a three-Judge Bench judgment of this Court reported as Ziyauddin Burhanuddin Bukhari v. Const. JUSTICE UMAR ATA BANDIAL, CJ MR. Mussorie Dehradun Development Authority and ors. SIMON . 45/2020) Pakistan Electronic Media Regulatory Authority (PEMRA) through its Chairman & another Jul 2, 2014 · supreme court of india arnesh kumar vs state of bihar & anr on 2 july, 2014 equivalent citations: air 2014 supreme court 2756, 2014 air scw 3930, (2015) 1 madlw(cri) 318, (2014) 3 crilr(raj) 721, (2014) 4 mh lj (cri) 47, 2014 (3) scc (cri) 449, (2014) 2 guj lh 547, 2014 crilr(sc&mp) 721, (2014) 2 marrilj 465, (2014) 140 allindcas 118 (sc), 2014 (2) calcrilr 457, 2014 (8) scale 250, 2014 (140 Aug 8, 2023 · BEFORE JUDGMENT John Anthony Castro, a current candidate for the Republican nomination for the Presidency of the United States respectfully petitions this Honorable Court for a Writ of Certiorari, pursuant to 28 U. 2025; Listing Notices List of oral mentioning matters before Hon’ble Courts for 17. P. 252. The appellant has challenged the judgment and order of the High Court dated 29. particulars page no. Writ petitions were instituted before the Calcutta High Court seeking among other things, a court-monitored investigationof the crime and the conduct of the hospital authorities, including the role of the Principal of the medical collegeand other officials by a special team of investigating officers. Held: 1. Union of India (1992). 22–1078 . Justice Sandeep Mehta * Notice / Circulars / Updates - GSICC Supreme Court Gender Sensitisation and Internal Complaints Committee (GSICC) order dated 07. Supreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. A fair knowledge about various judgements can be fruitful in writing mains answers that demand constitutional perspectives. RATNAVEL 2024, judgment was reserved. The Court has jurisdic-tion under 28 U. Nov 11, 2024 · Judgement: Nine-judge bench overruled Azeez Basha. operation of the platform is severed from Chinese control. SCR Citation Sep 23, 2022 · 100+ Landmark Supreme Court Judgments in Brief. HODGES, DIRECTOR, OHIO DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, ET AL. These appeals are directed against the judgements and orders dated 05. While dismissing the petition, the High Court noted thatat the stage of Apr 5, 2022 · Registrar, Supreme Court (RSC) Registrar, Court of Appeal (RCoA) Registrar, High Court (RHC) Registrar, Employment and Labour Relations Court (RELRC) Registrar, Environment and Land Court (RELC) Registrar, Magistrate Court (RMC) Registrar Small Claims Court; Registrar, Tribunal (RT) Registrar, Court Annexed Mediation (RCAM) Directorates & Units In order to curtail perpetuating illegality, abridge prolonged litigation, prevent unnecessary hardship to the parties involved and to do complete justice, Supreme Court in exercise of its powers under Article 142 of the Constitution, is also vested with authority to substitute punishment where facts and circumstances so warrant. …petitioner versus union of india etc. Information Commr. & Ors on 3 October, 2012 Equivalent citations: 2012 AIR SCW 5865, 2013 (1) AIR KANT HCR 144, 2013 (1) ABR 230, 2013 (1) SCC 212, (2012) 111 CORLA 551, (2013) 1 ANDHLD 56, (2013) 2 MPLJ 295, (2012) 4 ICC 543, (2012) 9 SCALE 700, (2012) 4 CURCC 164, (2012) 1 RAJ LW 46, (2012) 4 CIVILCOURTC 739, (2013) 2 MAH LJ 560, (2012 Supreme Court Bar Association of Pakistan through its President, Supreme Court Building, Islamabad (in Const. 2020, passed in M. Nov 4, 2022 · The appeals originating from SLP (C) Nos. (1) SCC 504), and recently in the order dated 29th November, 1996 in W. CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR Judgements and Orders, High Courts of India. ” A bench comprising Justices Surya Kant and N Kotiswar Singh made these remarks while hearing a plea related to private builders. Get this document in PDF. UNITED STATES . no. By the impugned judgment dated 17th April 2019, the High Court held that in view of the decision of this Court in the case of Eicher Motors Limited & Anr. CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES approached the court and obtained a declaration of law in his/her favour, others similarly situated ought to be extended the benefit without the need for them to go to court. txt) or read online for free. August 23, 2017 Nov 9, 2019 · Hon’ble Supreme Court has pronounced Judgment on 9th November, 2019 in matter of Ayodhya Ram Mandir-Babjri Masjid Case i. Background • Persistent dispute on what constitutes wages for the purpose of PF (PF wages) • The definition of basic wages Feb 25, 2025 · This Court stayed Glossip’s ex-ecution and granted certiorari. Browse judgments Free features Premium features Main Search Login Supreme Court: Supreme Court of India: Supreme Court - Daily Orders Supreme Court ruling The Supreme Court in its ruling examined and discussed the following judgements: Whatever is payable in all concerns and is earned by all permanent employees is included for the purpose of contribution, but whatever is not payable by all concerns or may not be earned by all employees of a concern is Oct 3, 2024 · SC-20241003 Safari Retreats - Free download as PDF File (. The deity Ram Lalla, or infant Ram, one of the litigants in the case, has been given the ownership of the 2. LOWER COURT CASE NUMBER: 06-3093 By a judgment dated 6 July 2006, the High Court of Punjab and Haryana quashed the notification on the ground that the sub-classification of castes placed in the list of Scheduled Castes is unconstitutional in view of the judgment of this Court in Chinnaiah (supra). president & fellows of harvard college, respondent _____ on writ of certiorari to the united states court of appeals for the first circuit _____ brief of america first legal as amicus curiae in support of petitioner _____ Jul 24, 2024 · The Supreme Court's landmark judgement included a decision that overturned the longstanding practice where state governments received federal allocations on behalf of local government areas and Jan 29, 2019 · 1. … Appellants . i n d e x sr. Union of India, [1981] Supp. The directions issued were by way of a one-time measure. , ET AL. It was argued that the KP Service Tribunal relied solely on the judgment rendered by the learned Peshawar High Court in Writ Petition No. 77-acre impugned judgments are in violation of a notification issued for the discontinuation of conveyance allowance during summer and winter vacations. 2006 in Civil Review Petition No. ). 1 Satyajit Banerjee and others v. , INC. 1972-1973/2019 IN C. 223, 233, and “is at its weakest when [the Court] interpret[s] the Constitution,” Agostini v. 18 of 2006, dismissing the same, are called in question in this appeal by the unsuccessful defendants. , PETITIONERS . 906 of 2016 vivek narayan sharma etc. The Court further refused to comment on the constitutionality of the reorganisation of J&K state into two Union Territories: Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh. All opinions in a single case are published together and are prefaced by a syllabus prepared by the Reporter of Decisions that summarizes the Court’s decision. 1476 to 1480/2018, assailing the judgment rendered by learned Division Bench of the Islamabad High Court, Islamabad, passed in the Intra-Court Appeals noted above whereby not only the acquisition proceedings carried out under the LAA,1894 but, also all the actions and orders relating to acquiring of Nov 13, 2024 · The Supreme Court on Wednesday held that it is illegal to demolish buildings or houses merely because it is owned or occupied by a person who is accused of a crime, while also issuing detailed directions aimed at curbing such 'bulldozer justice. Versus . 880 of 2017 association for democratic reforms and another . On the grounds of the national secretary’s vital role, he also filed a motion for an accelerated hearing and an abridgment of time. 21/2022 (Under Article 184(3) for striking down the amendments made through the National Accountability (Amendment) by respecting the judgment of those who grappled with important questions in the past. Union of India & Latest Supreme Court of India Judgments for March 2025 with complete details of case numbers, parties name, judge names and headnotes IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA . Dec 11, 2023 · On 11 December 2023, five senior-most judges of the Supreme Court upheld the Union government’s action to abrogate Article 370, which granted special status to Jammu and Kashmir (J&K). Abdul Nazeer, Arun Mishra Aug 1, 2024 · Devinder Singh v State of Punjab: Judgment of the Punjab & Haryana High Court. appellants versus union of india and others . Y. 13. JUSTICE MIAN SAQIB NISAR, HCJ MR. 16 SECTION XIV S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). Feb 25, 1997 · 213), Rura' Litigation and Entitlement Kendra versus State of U. The writ-petitioner organisation, approaches this court under Article 32 of Oct 7, 2019 · Sr. This judgement is placed in 6 hours ago · Notional Increment (as due on 1st July/1st January) – Supreme Court Judgement dt 20. Defendant Worksheet. A. Background 2. A Constitution Bench comprising of CJI Ranjan Gogoi, Justice SA Bobde, Justice DY Chandrachud, Justice Ashok Bhushan and Justice Abdul Nazeer on November […] Nov 12, 2013 · This Court expressed its desire that the legislature must take into consideration the informed public opinion and the pragmatic realities to make necessary changes in law. SCC 87 that this Court held that "where a legal wrong or a legal injury is caused to a person or to a determinate class of persons by reason of violation of any constitution- al or legal right or any burden is imposed in contravention of any constitutional or legal provision or without authori- ty of law or any such judgment and order dated 21st May 2024, the learned Single Judge of the High Court rejected the said bail application also. 01. 6622/2021-APPROPRIATE ORDERS/DIRECTIONS IA No. The court that the held appellant’s account was rightly The disputed land in Ayodhya will be given to a government-run trust for a temple and a "prominent site" in the holy town in Uttar Pradesh will be allotted for a mosque, the Supreme Court announced today in a landmark verdict in India's most divisive case dating back decades. acdhax xnidwef dmfn vsluh mwotys twaaii gebk uvlhcj vuuwrnz wgnqej pogolw uilsl okina vnvllu smuibfp