Hills have eyes 1977 vs 2006. More often than not, they miss the mark, but the 2006 re-imaging of Wes Craven's 1977 classic The Hills Have Eyes rivals the original in multiple ways. The group examines Wes Craven' The Hills Have Eyes is a 2006 American horror film directed by Alexandre Aja and co-written by Aja and Grégory Levasseur, in their English-language debut. Apr 7, 2017 · In conclusion, the 2006 version is a rare example of exactly what a remake should be. . Feb 5, 2024 · While the original Hills Have Eyes was considered extreme in 1977 and has a unique grit similar to the Texas Chainsaw Massacre, it doesn’t age well when we have a high-quality remake to compare it to. But I can understand why the original is well liked. Apr 3, 2025 · The 2006 remake, directed by Alexandre Aja, cranks up the gore and brutality but loses some of the raw impact of the original. Sep 11, 2025 · Horror fans have always had a love-hate relationship with remakes. It is a remake of Wes Craven 's 1977 film of the same name. At the end of the day, I liked both of the movies about the same for different reasons. Show Notes Episode Synopsis This week the Hack or Slash team compares the 1977 classic The Hills Have Eyes to its 2006 remake. What were your thoughts on these two? Do you prefer one to the other? Have a nice day. You take a film from decades before that has a solid, worthwhile story and update it with sleeker production values and more visceral gore for today’s desensitized audiences. The 2006 “The Hills Have Eyes” perfectly captures the intense and brutal nature of its storyline. It’s much flashier and more graphic, with a higher budget and more extreme visuals. I personally prefer the remake as that's what I was first shown. Horror enthusiasts often hold their favorites close, making the effort to revisit a cult classic a risky undertaking. owhti joz rnsooq ndtwwui rqlm ebabx wuoryf huo cffd odxfydo